Why Rosa Parks (Still) Matters

— Sunday, February 3rd, 2013 —

As the nation marks the 100th anniversary of the birth of Rosa Parks, we should avoid the temptation to see her as merely a historical figure, a heroine of the past. It would be easy to do so. After all, no city in America segregates its public transportation system by skin color, not even Montgomery, the capital of the old Confederacy, where Mrs. Parks famously refused to give up her seat to accommodate Jim Crow. Even so, Rosa Parks’ example is about the future as much as the past.

First of all, the memory of Rosa Parks ought to remind us that she didn’t live in what we refer to as “the civil rights era,” as though racial justice was achieved and can now be ignored. True, the awful state oppression against African-Americans, both north and south, was knocked down with legislative triumphs in areas of public accommodations, employment non-discrimination, and voting rights. Thank God. But racial reconciliation is never a finished project, at least not between Eden and Armageddon.

Beyond that, Christians especially ought to reflect on what Rosa Parks’ civil disobedience reminds us about our life together in society.

When Mrs. Parks refused to give up her seat, she was affirming an ancient truth of the reality of natural law.

The bus boycott, sparked by her, was a revolt against an unjust law. Mrs. Parks, and the activists she motivated, never argued the law wasn’t supported by the majority. They argued the law was wrong. As Martin Luther King Jr. also communicated in his “Letter from a Birmingham Jail,” civil law rests on a broader foundation of a law that is written in the heart, a law that transcends human cultures and majoritarian whims.

That natural law, embedded in the conscience, is the reason the power of the state, any state, is limited. Herod had some legitimate authority as ruler, but it was, as John the Baptist pointed out, “not lawful” that he should have another man’s wife (Matt. 14:4). Caesar had the legitimate authority to wield the sword against evildoers, an authority the Scriptures affirmed (Rom. 13:1-7), but he had no authority to dictate worship (Rev. 13:16-18). The temple leaders had a legitimate authority, an authority Jesus affirmed(Matt. 23:2-3), but they had no authority to forbid the preaching of the gospel (Acts 4:18-20).

The natural law stands above human law, and gives its legitimacy. The law maintains order precisely because it is not the arbitrary expression of a ruler or of a mob. The law must give an account to a more ultimate Lawgiver. That’s why Jesus, in his famous discourse on Caesar’s coin, distinguishes between duty that must be rendered to government and that which must be rendered to God.

Rosa Parks’ protest also affirms the persistence of natural rights.

When she refused to give up her seat, deprived to her on the basis of her skin color, Mrs. Parks defied a law that based human dignity on some devilish idea of white supremacy. This idolatry was encoded in law and embedded in culture. White children were taught not to give a lady like Rosa Parks the recognition of the title “Mrs.” or “Ma’am.” And the legal code designated what water fountains she could use and where she could sit.

Mrs. Parks, though, believed the old American creed that “all men are created equal and endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights.” That Jeffersonian principle is grounded in a concept of dignity older than the Enlightenment, the concept of a common human race made in the image of God (Gen. 1:27). This is why God, the Bible says, “shows no partiality” (Deut. 16:19; Acts 10:34; Rom. 2:11).

All human beings reflect his image, and are worthy of respect. And no human being is a god, with the power to exercise dominion over human nature itself. Human dignity isn’t “purchased” by voting power, commercial wealth, sexual attractiveness, natural ability, or anything else.

Finally, Rosa Parks pointed to the sacrifice of neighbor-love.

In refusing to give up her seat, Mrs. Parks wasn’t struggling for her own position. She did so on behalf of millions of others, many yet unborn. There’s a difference, in a truly Christian ethic, in fighting for our own prerogatives and in working for justice for others. Jesus calls us to give up the cloak, to walk the extra mile, to turn the cheek (Matt. 5:38-42). And yet, he also led the Apostle Paul to appeal to his rights as a Roman citizen not to be prosecuted for preaching the gospel (Acts 16:37-39). Why? It was because the issue wasn’t Paul’s personal comfort but the advance of the church as a whole.

Rosa Parks was a great heroine who deserves our honor. But let’s not consign her to the museum. Her heroism still speaks, and points to some old, old truths that are needed in a new century.

13 Responses to “Why Rosa Parks (Still) Matters”

  1. Bill N.

    When Ms. Parks passed away in October 2005, I was really moved by the story of her life, not so much what she did in Montgomery, Alabama, as important as that was, but by the quiet dignity with which she lived the rest of her life after the bus boycott. By her quiet and dignified life she was an example others who are always seeking center stage should take a cue from. Rosa Parks showed us a better way, not just by that one act in 1955. She showed us a better way by the way she lived the rest of her life with quite dignity. She made a difference.

  2. Christina

    I can see pretty much every one of this points apply to the unjust law of legal abortions & our need to fight it!

  3. Grant

    Regarding the link (http://5ptsalt.com/2013/02/04/russell-moore-rosa-parks-and-her-effort-to-kill-the-unborn/), Mr. Taylor’s article seems just a little strong. Only a little, though.

    Mr. Moore commends Rosa Parks’ display of “the reality of natural law,” “persistence of natural rights,” and “the sacrifice of neighbor-love.” Since she was a part of Planned Parenthood and their drive for abortion, it’s tragic that she didn’t seem to believe those principles as much as she should have. Seems she chose her causes based on herself and not any faith in the Gospel.

    I think Mr. Moore should maybe have included something about that, but this is his blog, not mine (just as 5 pt. Salt is Mr. Taylor’s blog, as his “Comment Policy” makes very clear). I don’t think that is reason for one Christian to label another Christian with a word with such a negative connotation as “ignoramus.”

    Joel Taylor in reply

    @Grant,

    The term “ignoramus” is merely Latin for “a lack of knowledge” which, in this case, Dr. Moore clearly exhibits in my opinion. God bless.

  4. Mark

    What happened to Rosa Parks was bad but what today is happening in the name of “Christianity” toward Westerners is just as wrong.

    We need more Pro-Western churches.

    Here’s a reading list for Pro-Western Christianity:

    http://prowesternchristianity.blogspot.com/

    God bless,

    Mark

  5. Randy Williams

    Regarding some of these comments, the really remarkable thing about pro-lifers is their assumption that to be pro-choice is to be in favor of abortion None of the pro-choice people I know are in favor of killing babies. But they’re also not in favor of having the government or some out-of-touch ecclesiastic tell women what they can and can’t do with their own skin. Even if you do believe Rosa Parks was dead wrong on abortion, that doesn’t negate her value to the civil rights movement and racial justice or the influence she lent for other humanitarian causes. We forget that there’s good and evil in all of us, and that wisdom sometimes emits from some of the most unlikely sources. In one way or another God can, and does, use all of us. Beyond that, I just hear the same old tired single-issue agendas from people who seem to believe, as others have suggested, that life begins at conception and ends at birth.

    Robert Sakovich in reply

    @Randy Williams,

    The problem with pro-choice, is that you are saying it is OK for somebody to choose to murder another human being. The abortion industry actually worked very craftily to bring about the “pro-choice” terminology in order to bring in people from the churches.

  6. Oscar Ossai

    I discovered Dr Moore ,just this morning as I read the article on the pontiff .Indeed ,we cannot do anything against the truth .We as church leaders and members need to pick up aspects of societal errors and correct them .To make the world a better place for all .The church is indeed the last hope of the world

Trackbacks

  1. Russell Moore, Rosa Parks and Her Effort to Kill the Unborn « 5 Pt. Salt
  2. The Briefing for Monday 2/4/2013 « Ponder Anew
  3. Why Rosa Parks (Still) Matters
  4. Check out | HeadHeartHand Blog
  5. Black History Month Roundup - Trillia Newbell